Please write to us on any topic, whether it's improvements to the site, getting something off your chest or letting us know the latest news or events where you are.


 

Traffic vs Crime
As one of our correspondent was saying, it seems Traffic Offences are more important than solving crime.

According to official police figures revealed today a third of all reported crimes were NOT investigated last year.

Serious offences such as sex attacks, robberies, fraud and violence were 'screened out'

The figures suggest 1.7 million crimes were not probed by English, Scottish and Welsh forces.

I wonder what the figures are for Vehicle tax evasion, speeding.....
Posted by The Editor on 23 November 2009
Mobiles in Cars
I've been reading with interest the comments made by various members of the public, particularly by those who feel they have been appointed, personally, to uphold the law.

Firstly I'd like to say, Let him that is without sin among you cast the first stone. I don't believe these people, no matter what their position in the society, are entirely without sin or transgression against the law.

Secondly, can everyone on this site who has contributed, really, honestly say, that they are so squeeky clean in every way regarding the law that they are quite within their rights to villify one driver who happened to answer her phone while sitting stationary in traffic? Really?

Is it not extremely rude to shout obscenities at strangers, regardless of what they are doing? Do we really have the right, as civillians, to personally enforce the law in any way we see fit? I personally feel that shouting "get off that fucking phone" is disgustingly rude and I don't feel anyone has the right to do that, no matter what they are doing. Especially since they have no idea and no right whatsoever, to judge or assume.

If satnavs were such a danger on the road persumably the law would have outlawed them on production. Presumably these have been found reasonably safe. Yes, there was a satnav on the front window - would it have been better placed on the passenger seat, on the side window, on the back seat? Where would these people like the satnav to go? Presumably these people have radios in their cars that need tuning, correction, changing. Persumably these impeccable people do not sit motionless in their cars, staring straight ahead not talking to anyone or being distracted in any way whatsoever. What paragons of virtue - let us all aspire to be such paragons of virtue.

One must assume that there is still life out there and flexibility and fallibility. Perhaps these people have too much time on their hands? Perhaps they have anger issues they are transferring onto stationary telephone answering drivers? Perhaps they are dissatisfied in their lives and this is their only form of entertainment, fulfilment.

Perhaps this particular man, who felt it within his rights to shout obscenities at strangers, is now retired and feeling slightly less of a man than he was before? Who knows. Let us all pray that in the future humanity will become pure and clean and good – oh Lord, what a wonderful world that would be!
Posted by Lilac Linda on 19 November 2009
MOBILE PHONE USE
What a good example the woman driver one of a Smart car with your logo on the back sets - driving along London Road during rush hour with a mobile phone clutched to her ear and a Satnav right in front of her so she can't see the road. £60 + 3 points if I was a policeman
Posted by Gareth on 09 October 2009
Yes, believe me, she's been severely reprimanded.

It's not uncommon though, I see it everywhere - I don't think anyone pays any attention to that law
Posted by Editor on 14 October 2009
I apologise for the outburst i am about to make but, being a traffic policeman in Tewkesbury i would like to know if anyone can provide me with the afforementioned registration number of this smart car as i would like to take this matter further. Does anybody realse the impact and the irresponsibility of these cretins that persist un using mobile telecommunications whilst driving. Speaking personnally i have attended many RTAs that have been caused by this type of social lowlife and you try to break the news to the grieving family. so if anyone can let us know please call 0117 974 7399 and ask to speak to Chris Peacock.
Posted by Chris Peacock on 11 November 2009
Whilst I can't argue against a Traffic Policeman and his expertise, I do have to say that there is such an inconsistency on this matter that I don't see how it can be resolved.

I've noticed that since this law was first introduced when everyone behaved and traffic officers were on a sharp lookout, the situation as I've winessed, has slipped way back.

I'm a motorcyclist and I do keep a watchful eye on motorists to see if they're paying attention before overtaking.

However, is this any worse than fiddling with the tuning on the radio?

I've nearly had accidents doing that.

Is it any worse than tinkering with the Sat Nav?

What about if your cup of coffee slips from it's moorings?

How about if your cigarette slips from your lips?

How can you possibly, sensibly legislate for all of these?

It's legal to use handsfree, isn't it? But apparently that distracts people too.

How many gadgets do police cars have?

So, as drivers we try and do distracting things only after checking the road around us or at red lights.

You can't legislate danger out of everything.

And finally, how come there appear to be really vigilant police all over the place for every kind of motoring offence, but nothing is done if your home is threatened or something is stolen.

Because motorists are an easy, profitable target?
Posted by Bryan Barrow on 18 November 2009
I think the overall message Mr Peacock has kindly taken the time out of protecting the roads to write, is that Mobiles distract drivers. However i think that it appears to be writen without much thought and obviously in the spur of the moment in anger of the situation. I was glad to read Bryans comment, i think it respecfully agrees that speaking on the phone does cause fatalities. But it does also mention other very relivant causes to road accidents so similar to phones. It is true, i agree with Bryan's examples and i could think of hundreds more to add as relivant as phones. I do also agree that traffic officers partake in several distracting activities that cause accidents everyday. And even more so with all the gadgets going on inside their cars. I think with all due respect to this how do i say, KEEN officer, he should let this incident slip ;)
Posted by Hugo Pheasantbottom on 19 November 2009
Duplication?
Hi there, just thought I'd add a comment - is the Editorial and the News the same? What's the difference between them? Also, on the page where you've got a fantastic pic of my son Anthony, his picture entirely obliterates the headline, whatever that is. Thought you might like to know. :-)
Posted by Linda on 10 April 2009
New site
Hey, love the new site it's just what we need
Posted by Roger Bowering on 14 March 2009
This is a brilliant idea - so great to have a forum for the Stroud community - to air their views, post their ads, sell things, buy things, tell everyone what's going on in Stroud. I hope everyone will find it useful!
Posted by Linda on 18 March 2009